Actions
Bug #12812
closed
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Assignee set to mame (Yusuke Endoh)
Updated by zenspider (Ryan Davis) over 8 years ago
- File deleted (
coverage_result_set.diff)
Updated by zenspider (Ryan Davis) over 8 years ago
This url will stay up to date better than a file attachment. I'm getting feedback from Nobu and fixing things:
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Feedback
Sorry for leaving this ticket untouched.
I cannot remember the detailed story of this ticket, but since 2.6, coverage library has supported Coverage.result(stop: false, clear: false). Is it enough? I still think Coverage.result= is too powerful.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) about 6 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Rejected
I'd like to close this issue tentatively. Feel free to reopen if you still think it is needed.
Actions
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0