Actions
Bug #13273
closed
Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in changeset r57765.
proc.c: documentation for Proc#{call,yield,[]}
proc.c: [DOC] fix and improve docs for Proc#{call,yield,[]}:
- change order of Document-method directives as workaround for an
RDoc rendering problem where the documentation for Proc#call displays
a "Document-method: []" code block. [ruby-core:79887] [Bug ] - add missing call-seq and example for Proc#yield
- remove pointless cross reference to Proc#yield
- update description for handling of extra or missing arguments,
improve examples and add cross reference to #lambda?
- change order of Document-method directives as workaround for an
Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) over 8 years ago
- Related to : RDoc bug for "Document-method: []" added
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) over 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN to 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: DONE
ruby_2_4 r57923 merged revision(s) 57765.
Updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga) over 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: DONE to 2.2: REQUIRED, 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) about 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.2: REQUIRED, 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE to 2.2: DONE, 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE
ruby_2_2 r58105 merged revision(s) 57765.
Updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga) about 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.2: DONE, 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: DONE to 2.2: DONE, 2.3: DONE, 2.4: DONE
ruby_2_3 r58185 merged revision(s) 57765.
Actions
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0