Conversation

johndoe31415

The code provided does not work, since g() does not take any parameters. Fixed.

@AnthonyCalandra

Good catch! I actually intended to call f(false) but I think using f and g separately make the example clearer. Could you also remove the parameter on f and just have it return the "constant initializer" string itself? I'd be happy to merge it after the change.

@johndoe31415

Just did that and forcepushed my branch. Happy Sunday, cheers!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on . Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.