Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simonjbeaumont added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
### Motivation In #26 we bumped the minimum tools version to Swift 5.9, but we left the `#if swift(>5.9)` compiler directive when enabling existential any by default. ### Modifications Remove #if swift(>=5.9) check in Package.swift ### Result No checking for Swift 5.9+, because that's now the default. ### Test Plan CI.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on . Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Part of addressing apple/swift-openapi-generator#75 and apple/swift-openapi-generator#119.
Modifications
Bumped Swift tools version to 5.9 and made the
ExistentialAnybuild setting unconditional.Result
Building the package requires 5.9 now.
Test Plan
Ran tests, all passed when using a Swift 5.9 toolchain.